Would children be better served by a program devised by Texas for TEXAS

0 Comment

The education system hence has roots in the federal controlled program. According to some activist and politicians, some people prefer the education system to be run at the state level rather than at the government level (James amp. Kevin 17). Education should be managed and controlled at the state local level since different communities have corresponding different needs. Employing a similar curriculum in all may sideline some community’s important aspects of their culture. For example, if examinations show that a certain school is poor in mathematics, it is quite easy to adjust to change this deficit. The parents and the community of Texas at large are well conversant with the educational needs in the society than someone else in California. If the students of Texas are more interested in a certain career than the other, then this passion should be exploited for mass output of human brains. Education controlled at the state level would allocate schools the flexibility they require particularly in managerial and teaching practice. Different populations of our children face different obstacles in learning. Additionally, these children learn in a different manner due to different upbringing, peer influence and cultural activity. We have to recognize this and react by offering schools much freedom to change with circumstances (James amp. Kevin 77). This will minimize wasteful allocations made from the current federal government which has little use locally. The flexibility will allow schools to and states to plan and implement their timetables and annual calendars appropriately in favor of their other activities and climatic conditions. For instance, when it is too hot in Texas, it may be apparently too cold I another state making education for children not favorable. Hence, having education managed at the local stage will allow the state of Texas to implement a new curriculum and education annual c calendar specifically suiting economic, climatic and political activities in Texas. In accordance to an article in New York Times by Kate Taylor on 6th March, 2012, entailing school funds allocation being reduced by the government to schools, if states had taken excellent control of school, such a thing could not be affect them. According to the interview by John on education, this leadership structure would promote more co-operations between school boards and city/municipality/county governments in district control. Funding resolutions would be completed by a working group consisting of board members in Texas and potentially extra mayor-selected members while curriculum decisions and instruction would be exclusively dealt with by the school board. This has the benefit of allowing school boards on focusing on what they do or can do best as far as education is concerned and allows voters to command the school board in terms of performance regular observation (Robert 78). School superintendents would proceed as the unifying oblige between the state and the federal government and a countenance to the public. It will be easier for parents to reach the local administration, monitor their children educational systems and contribute to any reforms and procedures required. For instance, if parents are complaining about a certain issue concerning education, they will not have to travel all the way to the federal government educational headquarters to be addressed on their demands. They will instead visit the educational board managing education here in Texas and have their problem solved by the board. This will enhance a bit of democracy and time consciousness in Texas community (Sheppard 88). This is because the educational system will run on its own as a