The Culture of Fear in 1984 a Novel by George Orwell

0 Comment

Throughthe author, we see thebeliefsoffearin the year nineteen eighty-four just as Koestler by rising to a climacticmomentofarrest, which with no doubts will drive us to anguish and loss of life. Thefearofmomentis presented by meddling with everymomentof Winston’s mindfulness similar to Rubashov in the text of “Darkness at Noon,” through issuing enough information of the perceptionpoliceandpolicestate. Moreover,Orwellpresentsa security state where people investigate each other to come up with acultureoffear.There are several instances in whichthe authorpresentsacultureofpanic,and this is by the climacticmomentof legal restraint, which is feared by many from the start of the story. In 1984, calamity struck ad Julia andWinstonare arrested around Mr. Charrington’s flat when a sharp and loud voice is heard at their back from the telescreen telling Julia andWinstonthat they are dead. Through this quote, we see how the theme offearis brought out in the entire novel on that fateful morning when thepoliceattack their residing placethoughtto have been a safe place.The author makes use of direct speech in the novel, which acts as a symbolism to bring in the idea of a climactic and surprisingmomentand predicts their psychological downfall and the fall of their revolt against theparty. The statement “behind them” in the novel symbolizes thepartyand shows that thepartyhas been on their neck this whole while. In the same way, Koestler shows the climacticmomentofarrest. This is the time the twopoliceofficers were at the neck of Rubashov’s door to arrest him. Through this, it is crystal clear that Rubashov is being apprehended in actual life in the same period in his desire.In the opening phrases of the first and second paragraphs, Koestler makes use of repetition of the words “hammering on the door to show the difference between imagination and facts, which asthoughtpredicts the future of Rubashov. There is the use of imagery and onomatopoeia to show the climacticmomentoffearin a transparent manner by application of the phrase hammering. This is the same as the use of direct speech byOrwellto signify the actual intrusion of their private life. In all these stories, thefearofarrestand its inevitability follow each other carefully, voice acting as a signal. In all texts, information is extracted from undercoverpoliceof totalitarian state for revolutionary against the Nazis, will be taken as being arrested by the S.S, and led to the concentration camps. From the Second World War fought by the KGB in Stalin’s Russia and Stasi found in communist East Germany, a parallel toWinstonis created, written byOrwellin 1948.The Culture of Fear in 1984, a Novel by George Orwell, alsopresentsfearusing the thematic ofa policestate. When thepoliceofficers are frightened, that’s in 1984. this helps preservefearin our community. Themomentthe perceivedpolicearrives,Winstonexplains the nakedness feeling, and he did not attempt to take any step when Julia is hit. Through this, we learn that Julia’s partner is obedient to thepolice. Nakedness proves the vulnerability ofWinstonand the fact that he dares not to make any step when Julia is hit betrayal to Julia. He does not make any efforts to protect Julia, who he claims to be loving. Through Orwell’s description of the attacker, it is evident that he was brutal and well-built. He claims that the attackers were solid men in black garments and iron-shod. We see some similarities here to thepolicein the novel by Koestler. In that particular novel, we findpoliceofficers who have police uniforms that show aggressively barbed cross and the dreaded big guns. From this illustration, we learn some form of terror and hostility.In 1984, the novelpresentsthe theme of fright, panic prevails everywhere, and this seems to be the party’s significant way of control. It is assisted by a powerful insight of terror thatarrestand prevent citizens from going against thepartyand doingthoughtoffense.Asa thought, the approaching ruin of room 101 can stop several from changing. Still, there is a powerful judgment of outrage that the novelpresents, and it’s connected to this since thepartywho is perpetrating thethoughtoffense andapprehendthose who still instill panic to the residents of Oceania. In summary,Orwell presentsand tries to make us understand the customs of fright by distrust and a primary human essential for living. This is as per Orwell’sthought.