Menu

“Psychologists&#x27

0 Comment

involvement in assessments related to death penalty cases”In 1,000-1,250 words, consider the following: Discuss human rights as it relates to the controversy. Explain ethical implications that may arise for both sides of the controversy.A minimum of three peer-reviewed sources and the textbook should be used to support this paper. Sources should be 2010 or newerPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style GuideOrganizational tips: In the introduction, explain the chosen controversy and introduce the topics of human rights and ethical implications that will be covered in the paper. The introduction does not require a heading. After the introduction, create the first heading: Human Rights (first level headings should be centered in bold type). In this section, explain the concept of Human Rights and relevant development of APA standards on Human Rights. Under Ethical Implications, explain the arguments for each side of the controversy and the APA ethical standards involved. A Conclusion section should also be included.In addition to 1.02, specific and relevant APA ethics code standards Sections 2, 3, 4 and 9 should also be cited, as related to human rights and ethical implications, in the case of psychologists completing assessments and offering testimony in death penalty cases.18/05/202030psychology