Plato Symposium Phaedrus

0 Comment

This is manifested in the denial by Lysias to remain committed to the truths and beliefs of existence. There are several ways that Plato uses different goals to show the readers the path to enlightenment. For instance, he involves the use of dialogue between Phaedrus and the other gods such as Acusilaus, Hesiod and Parmenides in the admiration of love. In other words, according to the teachings of Phaedrus, Lysias should use his competence to fight for his lover through sacrifice. This is in line with the sacrifices of other notable gods such as Achilles who protected his best friend, Patroclus. On that account, Plato intends to show that love is an, important binding, factor in the establishment of relationships through blessedness and honor. Additionally, this compliments with the gaining of honor among men especially in terms of rewards and admiration from other gods (Plato 36). Therefore, the decision by Lysias to remain non-committal to the behavior of his lover is another form of enlightenment in terms of the wisdom of love. Furthermore, this means the different goals are attached to the enlightenment of fighting for one’s lover in the face of adversity. Moreover, this is apparent in the alteration of the behaviors of Phaedrus and Lysias during their walks in the park. It also shows the benefit of understanding how love works in the hard times especially in the definition of the fundamental goals. There are several effects of seeing Alcibiades in the context of the existing vision. Alcibiades comes to the room where he finds the rest of the philosophers sober and is praising the virtues of love. However, after an instance of ridicule of Socrates, he turns and heaps praise on the man whom he says saved his life. This is the symbolism of courage and bravery that creates the image of a man with respect for elders. Alcibiades also manifests the elements of sexuality among the gods especially Socrates who may be a homosexual. Therefore, I think Plato provide an inoculation against mad love especially in the desire of Alcibiades to make love with Socrates during the time they are sleeping. The fact that Alcibiades is handsome also complicates the inoculation espoused by Plato when the character enters the cloak of Socrates expecting sexual favors …they were so godlike — so bright and beautiful, so utterly amazing… (Plato 56). In the continuation of the conversation, Socrates is characterized with a distorted sexuality that explains the mad love of the gods. In other words, there is a guard against the rigors of those already afflicted by love. Therefore, there are numerous ways that would make it hard to climb the imaginary ladder mentioned by Nussbaum with or without the presence of Alcibiades. This is because Alcibiades is the prime embodiment of the vision of love that is preached by Phaedrus. Additionally, there are the sexual repercussions of mounting the ladder in terms understanding the ideals and objectives Alcibiades through the successive dialogues (Plato 89). Moreover, with the presence of Socrates who is a sworn lover as noted by Alcibiades, there will be no social implications in terms of mannerism accomplishment and satisfaction. Euripides There are various ways that non-human powers use madness and mad love for their purposes. Bacchae is a character with desire for divine powers from the gods in return for vengeance against the men. The essence for the revenge in the