Democracy Democracy Various forms of government have existed throughout history of men as civilizations developed and humans advanced their knowledge in various field to survive and flourish. Dictatorship, kingdom, sultanate, communism, socialism and democracy are some of the various forms that were developed. Each of them has their own advantages and disadvantages together with their unique histories and founders. In the paper, democracy would be the focus of the discussion. The origin and issues of democracy would be tackled in depth together with the advantages and disadvantages. Next, democratic process and democratic governance would be defined and differentiated and discussed on how each of them affects one another. The paper would have the conclusion at the end to summarize the main points and draw a final statement based on the major ideas presented. People have been searching for freedom as they want to have equal rights and enjoy the experience of being in-charge of their lives. They would like to be absent from control from other people and they might also hate being dictated on what to do. That pursuit brings about democracy as a form of government. The concept of democracy wants to create a system free from prejudice and tyranny but it seems that the conservatives and the elite interests become the priority. Those ideals were the basic foundation of the American Constitution that tackled freedom. The radical thinkers were not presented during the initial formation of the constitution built on democracy (Beard, 1993). People who were of elites were the ones who were present and molded the first constitution. Insecurities rise for the minorities as the law of majority was the ones favored by democracy and its constitution of that time. The development was based on the past experience wherein people had little advancement in their lives due to lack of access to education and opportunity for growth. They became very limited in options especially for the poor people (Gilley, 2009). Sometimes such concept made them poor as they were labeled and oppressed by the system that were not able to handle their plight. Plato had found the democratic process and democratic governance to be different. He separated the concepts through instruction which could be found to be problematic for modern day democracy. It might hamper the development and even restrain the minority to pursue the democracy by voicing out their opinions and suggestions (Santas, 2007). Being instructive means one-sided suggestion to be followed to create an ideal system. It may conflict with the concept of democracy which is freedom for all. Some even confused democracy with the value of good but the good depends upon person which means democracy may not become so good if clashes occur because of the given freedom. It may have negative effects at present and future (Ranney and Kendall, 1951). All in all, democracy may need to be open to all and for further studies as elites may believe in instructional way of democratic process but it may undermine the rights and freedom of the minorities. Those minorities may be the ones who need the most attention and help in that case. ReferencesBeard, C. A. (1993). Framing the constitution. In P. Woll (Ed.), American government: Readings and cases (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/Gilley, B. (2009). Is democracy possible? Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 113-127.Ranney, A., amp. Kendall, W. (1951). Democracy: Confusion and agreement. Political Research Quarterly, 4(3), 430–439.Santas, G. (2007). Platos criticisms of democracy in the Republic. Social Philosophy and Policy, 24(2), 70–89.