Menu

C410DBRubric

0 Comment

Discussion Board Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content (70%) Advanced 90-100% Proficient 70-89% Developing 1-69% Not Present Total Initial Post: Content 36 to 40 points: Each question/prompt is answered thoroughly and logically. Major points are stated clearly and effectively.  Clear, logical flow to post; stayed on topic. Personal examples are used appropriately 28 to 35.5 points: Most questions/prompts are answered. Major points are stated clearly and effectively for the most part.  Post is clear, logical and focused for the most part. Personal examples are overused. 1 to 27.5 points: Most prompts/ questions are answered. Lack of clarity, coherence, logic and focus in key areas. Personal examples are over-relied upon. 0 points Not Present Initial Post: Research Engagement 15.5 to 17.5 points: Ideas from the reading and presentations from the Module/Week are integrated. One (1) “outside” (not from class) scripture is incorporated into the post. One (1) “outside” (not from the text or class) “scholarly” reference (Journal or Law Review) is incorporated into the post. 12.5 to 15 points: Some ideas from the reading and presentations from the Module/Week are incorporated. Scripture is used but not incorporated. Scripture is not “quoted” for context. Reference is used but not scholarly. Reference is not incorporated. 1 to 12 points: Readings and presentations from the Module/Week are not incorporated. No “outside” scripture incorporated. No “outside” reference incorporated. 0 points  Not Present Replies: Content 27 to 30 points: One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. It’s clear what the other student’s said. There was a detailed “analysis” of the other student’s reasoning. In addition to analysis, the post moves the other student’s post forward, with new ideas, questions, and research. One (1) “outside” (not from the text or class) “scholarly” reference (Journal or Law Review) is incorporated into the post. 21 to 26.5 points: One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. It’s not clear what the other student said. No “analysis” of the other student’s reasoning New ideas, research, questions, and analysis are not included. Reply posts do not seem to actually forward the classmate’s post. Agreement or disagreement with some reasoning Reference is used but not scholarly. 1 to 20.5 points: Missing one reply post. No analysis It’s completely unclear what the other student said. Post is an opinion reply only Mere agreement or disagreement only Reply post only asks questions No “outside” reference incorporated. 0 points  Not Present Structure (30%) Advanced 90-100% Proficient 70-89% Developing 1-69% Not Present Total Grammar, Spelling & APA: Initial Post 18 to 20 points: Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. 14 to 17.5 points: Some errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. 1 to 13.5 points: Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. 0 points  Not Present Word Count Initial Post 6.75 to 7.5 points: 150–250 words per reply. 5.25 to 6.5 points: 80%-50% words less than the required length. 1 to 5 points: 49%-1% words less than the required length. 0 points  Not Present Grammar, Spelling & APA: Replies 9 to 10 points: Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. 7 to 8.5 points  Some errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. 1 to 6.5 points:  Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. 0 points  Not Present Professor Comments: Total: /125